Monrovia – The Capitol Arson trial witnessed renewed legal tension Monday, December 1, after state prosecutors filed yet another motion seeking the removal of a seated juror, this time alleging that Juror Antoinette Mulbah is a “CDCian” who supposedly concealed political ties during the jury selection process.
By Willie N. Tokpah
Filed before Criminal Court “A”, presided over by Judge Roosevelt Z. Willie, the prosecution claims that Madam Mulbah misled the court during voir dire, and should therefore be disqualified. Prosecutors say her alleged role as a district coordinator within the Congress for Democratic Change (CDC) raises questions about her neutrality, particularly in a case involving former Speaker J. Fonati Koffa.
However, defense lawyers sharply criticized the latest application, describing it as part of a “coordinated pattern of juror intimidation” by the state. According to them, the prosecution is attempting to influence the composition of the jury after repeatedly failing to provide any legitimate grounds for removal.
Judge Willie Already Rejected a Similar Motion Last Week
This fresh filing marks the third consecutive attempt by the prosecution to unseat a juror.
Just last week, Judge Willie firmly denied a similar motion in which prosecutors made nearly identical accusations against another panel member.
Defense lawyers argue that Monday’s motion is simply a recycled version of last week’s rejected effort, insisting that the state is “grasping at political straws” instead of focusing on evidence in the landmark case.
Defense Says Motion Is Politically Motivated
Counsel for Koffa and the co-defendants said the prosecution’s claims hinge largely on social media photos and unverified partisan allegations, far below the standard of proof required to remove a sworn juror.
“This is becoming routine,” one defense lawyer remarked. “Every time the state loses a motion, they turn around and accuse a different juror of bias.
The defendants, including Hon. J. Fonati Koffa, deserve fairness, not politically motivated attempts to reshape the jury.”
Arguments Not Heard, Defense Requests Time
When the matter was called, the defense requested a continuance to properly respond to the motion. Judge Willie granted the request and rescheduled arguments for Tuesday, December 2, delaying any immediate consideration of the state’s claims.
Court observers say that, given the judge’s firm position last week on similar issues, the prosecution may again face difficulty convincing the court.
The trial continues.
Support Independent Journalism
Your support helps FrontPage Africa continue delivering independent, credible, and impactful journalism. Every contribution strengthens our ability to investigate, inform, and hold power accountable while keeping quality journalism accessible to our readers.
Support our journalism or subscribe to receive the latest FrontPage Africa stories and updates.
