26.3 C
Liberia
Friday, September 18, 2026

Lawmakers Raise Constitutional Concerns Over Anti-Corruption Court’s Burden of Proof Provision

MONROVIA – A provision of Liberia’s law establishing the National Anti-Corruption Court has come under renewed scrutiny after a member of the House of Representatives questioned whether it undermines the constitutional right to the presumption of innocence.


By Emmanuel Weedee-Conway


Montserrado County District 14 Representative Muka Kamara has called on the Legislature to review Section 5 of Title 17(a) of the Revised Liberian Code of Laws, arguing that its language could come in conflict with protections guaranteed under Liberia’s 1986 Constitution.

In a communication presented to the House of Representatives, Kamara maintained that the section dealing with the presumption of innocence appears to shift the burden of proof from the prosecution to the accused, a move he believes is inconsistent with constitutional principles.

Article 21(h) of the Constitution provides that every person “shall not be compelled to furnish evidence against himself/herself and shall be presumed innocent until the contrary is proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Kamara argued that any legal provision that weakens this safeguard risks violating one of the country’s most fundamental constitutional protections.

He also cited Article 2 of the Constitution, which declares the Constitution being the supreme law of the Republic and renders null and void any law that is inconsistent with its provisions.

The communication sparked discussion among lawmakers, with members expressing differing opinions on whether the House could immediately address the issue.

In a brief consideration, several legislators noted that the Anti-Corruption Court law was not formally before the House for amendment or repeal, making it procedurally difficult for Plenary to alter any of its provisions at this stage.

Although no action was taken, the debate highlighted broader concerns about balancing the fight against corruption with the protection of constitutional rights.

Kamara urged his colleagues to undertake a legislative review of the disputed section to ensure that the Anti-Corruption Court law remains fully aligned with the Constitution while preserving the effectiveness of the country’s anti-corruption framework.

The communication was officially noted by Plenary as the House vows to ensure that Liberia’s laws comply with constitutional standards.

Support Independent Journalism

Your support helps FrontPage Africa continue delivering independent, credible, and impactful journalism. Every contribution strengthens our ability to investigate, inform, and hold power accountable while keeping quality journalism accessible to our readers.

Support our journalism or subscribe to receive the latest FrontPage Africa stories and updates.

Hot this week

Business Community Plan Another Protest; Lawmaker Calls For Calm

Monrovia - In the wake of mounting speculations regarding...

Health Care Service Report Progresses in Gbarpolu County

Gbarpolu County - It was an interesting gathering for...

Liberia: The EU spent $16 million to help rape victims get justice, but paralyzed legal system convicts just 2 rapists in 6 years

Summary: A 57-year-old grandmother in Todee District says she was raped...

Global Governance Initiative: Towards a More Inclusive and Equitable Global Order

Introduction The twenty-first century is characterized by rapid globalization, technological...

ICE Deports Former Liberian Combatant Accused of War-Era Atrocities

Monrovia — A former Liberian combatant accused by U.S....

Liberia: State Rests as Defense Challenges 5,000-Bag Figure, Witness Accounts

Monrovia — The prosecution has rested its case against former...

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img